CPT Q. 008: Is subduction geometrically possible only along a straight line?

Apr 1, 2012 by John Baumgardner · plate tectonics ·

CPT Q. #8 – 101 Questions and Answers Concerning Catastrophic Plate Tectonics

Q. 8. Is subduction geometrically possible only along a straight line?

Response: According to GPS measurements, subduction is taking place today into the arc-shaped Aleutian Trench, the arc-shaped Sumatra Trench, and many other trenches that are far from straight lines. The error in the belief that subduction can occur only along a straight line is a failure to recognize that a subducting plate deforms as it plunges into the mantle. Many papers in the peer-reviewed literature provide strong seismic evidence that subducted slabs tear and deform dramatically in their journey downward into the mantle.

One location where slab tear is almost a certainty is at the Aleutian-Kamchatka corner. In the paper by Davaille and Lees, “Thermal modeling of subducted plates: tear and hotspot at the Kamchatka corner,”¹ the authors ask:

“How can the Pacific Plate, which is subducting at an oblique angle in the western Aleutians, physically connect to the relatively steeply dipping Kamchatka slab to the west?”

They continue:

“The surficial manifestation of the connection is the massive Bering transform zone (TZ), extending from Attu Island westward towards Kamchatka (see figure below). In Kamchatka the margin between the Pacific Plate and North America takes a sharp turn southwards, towards the Kurile Trench and Japan. How does the Pacific Plate accommodate this sharp apparent bend? Does the Pacific plate drape over the corner as a tablecloth folds around a table corner, or is the Pacific Plate torn at the corner along the TZ to accommodate the deformation? In this paper we explore evidence and implications for the latter hypothesis.”

The authors do make a strong case that there is a tear in the Pacific Plate along the Bering Fracture Zone.

Map view of the northwest Pacific. The 3000-m depth contour from the ETOPO5 database (ed: see the now superseded ETOP01 database) outlines the Pacific Plate boundaries and the Meiji–Emperor–Hawaiian chain starting east of the Kamchatka subduction region. The Bering transform zone comprehends the Steller and the Bering faults extending from Kamchatka to east of Attu Island. The arrows show the present-day Pacific Plate motion. High heat flux values are found on and around Meiji seamount.

Editor: Add to this the beautiful high definition poster by Jay Patton, “Earthquake Report: Bering fracture zone: UPDATE #1,” 2017 (http://earthjay.com/?p=5625):

Patton describes these figures:

In the upper left corner I include a regional tectonic map showing Kamchatka and the westernmost tip of the westernmost Aleutian Islands (Davaille and Lees, 2004).

In the lower right corner I show a schematic illustration that depicts how the subduction transitions to strike-slip in the region of the Attu Island (Davaille and Lees, 2004).

To the right is a large scale map of this region showing the complicated intersection of strike slip and compressional tectonics as the tip of the Aleutians intersects with Kamchatka (Gaedicke et al., 2000).

In the upper right corner is a figure showing seismicity in this region (Davaille and Lees, 2004). There is a map (with earthquakes plotted vs. depth in color) and several cross sections (one parallel to the Kamchatka trench and two normal/perpendicular to the trench).

The extreme deformation that subducted slabs undergo is beautifully illustrated in a recent paper by Sigloch and Nolet entitled: “Two-stage subduction history under North America inferred from multiple-frequency tomography.”² Figure 2 from this paper, reproduced below, shows via seismic tomography the present shape of the Farallon Plate, which has subducted beneath the western coast of North America since the earliest Jurassic and continues to do so as the modern Juan de Fuca Plate along the coasts of Oregon and Washington. The authors infer from the seismic data as well as from numerous surface observations that this plate underwent a large amount of tearing in its complicated history.

Original caption: **"Three-dimensional views of the subducted Farallon Plate under North America.** Isosurface is rendered where P-velocity is 0.4% faster than expected; color indicates depth. (a) Map view of the Cascadia subduction system (S1, S2, N1, N2, W), and its predecessor (F1, F2) to the east. Shallow fast structure that would obstruct the view (for example, the craton) is not rendered. East of 100◦ W, only structure below 800 km depth is rendered; extent of slab material F1 in the transition zone is shaded blue. ‘Me’ (dashed line) is the continuation of the Mendocino fracture zone underground. ‘SG’ (solid line) marks the slab gap, a 2,500-km-long tear that subdivides the currently subducting plate. A lateral tear ‘T’ between upper and lower mantle (dotted line) is best appreciated in b. (b) A bird’s eye view of the Cascadia system from the northeast."

Studies on the way slabs deform after they subduct reveal that they can and do undergo extreme deformations, including tears. Most of the studies utilize seismology to provide actual images of these deforming masses of rock inside the earth. The fact that subducted slabs can and do deform means that geometrical constraints that would apply to perfectly rigid slabs do not apply to the real ones. This conclusion is valid not only in the case of the uniformitarian framework but also in the case of CPT.

A. Davaille and J. M. Lees, “Thermal modeling of subducted plates: tear and hotspot at the Kamchatka corner,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 226 293-304, 2004 ↩︎
K. Sigloch, N. McQuarrie, and G. Nolet, “Two-stage subduction history under North America inferred from multiple-frequency tomography,” Nature Geosciences, 1, 458-462, 2008, see here. ↩︎