Can random molecular interactions create life? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part I)

This entry is part 2 of 6 in the series Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate

Many evolutionists are persuaded that the 15 billion years they assume for the age of the cosmos is an abundance of time for random interactions of atoms and molecules to generate life. A simple arithmetic lesson reveals this to be no more than an irrational fantasy.1

This arithmetic lesson is similar to calculating the odds of winning the lottery. The number of possible lottery combinations corresponds to the total number of protein structures (of an appropriate size range) that are possible to assemble from standard building blocks. The winning tickets correspond to the tiny sets of such proteins with the correct special properties from which a living organism, say a simple bacterium, can be successfully built. The maximum number of lottery tickets a person can buy corresponds to the maximum number of protein molecules that could have ever existed in the history of the cosmos.  Continue reading “Can random molecular interactions create life? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part I)”


  1. Featured image of the DNA Double Helix Molecule originally from here (now obsolete), from Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: DNA Causes Geneticists, Other Scientists, Join Ranks of Dissenters (April 6, 2009). 

But What About the Geological / Fossil Record? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part III)

This entry is part 4 of 6 in the series Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate

Just as there has been glaring scientific fraud in things biological for the past century, there has been a similar fraud in things geological. The error, in a word, is uniformitarianism. This outlook assumes and asserts the earth’s past can be correctly understood purely in terms of present day processes acting at more or less present day rates. Just as materialist biologists have erroneously assumed material processes can give rise to life in all its diversity, materialist geologists have assumed the present can fully account for the earth’s past. In so doing, they have been forced to ignore and suppress abundant contrary evidence that the planet has suffered major catastrophe on a global scale.  Continue reading “But What About the Geological / Fossil Record? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part III)”

But How Is Geological Time To Be Reckoned? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part IV)

This entry is part 5 of 6 in the series Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate

With the discovery of radioactivity about a century ago, uniformitarian scientists have assumed they have a reliable and quantitative means for measuring absolute time on scales of billions of years. This is because a number of unstable isotopes exist with half-lives in the billions of year range. Confidence in these methods has been very high for several reasons. The nuclear energy levels involved in radioactive decay are so much greater than the electronic energy levels associated with ordinary temperature, pressure, and chemistry that variations in the latter can have negligible effects on the former.

Furthermore, it has been assumed that the laws of nature are time invariant and that the decay rates we measure today have been constant since the beginning of the cosmos Continue reading “But How Is Geological Time To Be Reckoned? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part IV)”

Just How Do Coded Language Structures Arise? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part II)

This entry is part 3 of 6 in the series Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate

One of the most dramatic discoveries in biology in the 20th century is that living organisms are realizations of coded language structures. All the detailed chemical and structural complexity associated with the metabolism, repair, specialized function, and reproduction of each living cell is a realization of the coded algorithms stored in its DNA. A paramount issue, therefore, is how do such extremely large language structures arise?  Continue reading “Just How Do Coded Language Structures Arise? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part II)”

But What About Light From Distant Stars? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part V)

This entry is part 6 of 6 in the series Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate

An entirely legitimate question then is how we could possibly see stars millions and billions of light years away if the earth is so young. Part of the reason scientists like myself can have confidence that good science will vindicate a face-value understanding of the Bible is because we believe we have at least an outline of the correct answer to this important question.1

This answer draws upon important clues from the Bible while applying standard general relativity. The result is a cosmological model that differs from the standard Big Bang models in two essential respects. First, it does not assume the so-called cosmological principle, and, second, it invokes inflation at a different point in cosmological history.   Continue reading “But What About Light From Distant Stars? (Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate: Part V)”


  1. [18] D. R. Humphreys, Starlight and Time, Master Books, Colorado Springs, 1994. 

Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate – Introduction

This entry is part 1 of 6 in the series Highlights of the Los Alamos Origins Debate

John R. Baumgardner, Ph.D.

Expanded by Nicholas Petersen


  1. Posted originally on globalflood.org. ICR has the original article posted on their website here